Taylor Jacobson reports:
"Unfortunately, experts tend to be a bit self-promoting and arrogant, and arrogance is a sure way to lose your readers. The opposite approach won’t work either. Timid, non-confrontational storytelling doesn’t do justice to the value you can contribute to your readers. So, what’s a writer to do?...Humility creates a natural connection to your reader. Acknowledging failures makes you seem human to your readers. On top of that, your failure validates how you came into the knowledge that you’re presenting. Failures can even be a great source of humor. Being authentic and vulnerable also shows confidence. You’re willing to lay it on the line, imperfections and all. This confidence – without arrogance – is exactly what will draw readers to you...Recounting your experience allows your reader to relate to you. By identifying with your story, your readers can make inferences and convince themselves of the relevance of what you have to say. By staying present to your own journey – where you started, how you transformed, where you are now – you give your knowledge necessary context...Generalizations have their time and place – they’re great for headers, topic sentences and summarizing points...Once you’ve used generalizations to create structure, you can dive right into the details, which bring your expertise to life...'I' is the most powerful way to tell a story. Your stories are powerful credentials and hooks. They draw your reader in, letting them know who you are...Telling a story in the first person is also a kind of evidence-based approach to making an argument. Just as citing your sources lends you credibility, citing your experience does so as well. 'You' is the voice we use when speaking to a friend. This is the riskiest voice because it can easily become preachy, but it is also essential in order to connect with your reader. Every time you use this voice, try speaking the lines aloud as if to an imagined friend over a drink or dinner. If you don’t feel comfortable saying it to a friend, it won’t sound right to your reader either. 'We' is a great voice for making generalizations...'We' is a great way to humbly make assertions about the way things are because we show ourselves as equals to our readers...Once you’ve established context and humility [with a brief personal back-story], you’re ready to share the lessons you’ve learned. Now you can switch to the second person or first person plural...Just because you’re humble doesn’t mean you aren’t going to put a stake in the ground. Equivocating – reporting information without adding your perspective – will bore your readers to death. After all, it’s your perspective that your readers are after. We merely need to recognize that what we’re presenting is not a dogma handed down from on high. It is not a universal truth. It is a truth in our lives, at this moment. Acknowledge the limits of your knowledge and you can largely preempt the challengers and naysayers...Even using every trick in the book, we can’t always strike the proper tone. Putting our writing aside and revising it later may still be the best tool of all. Hear yourself reacting to the tone and word choice, and re-write the post while you can still feel that reaction. Your instinct will easily recognize places where you’ve been too abstract or impersonal, too assertive or preachy, or just too verbose. No need to be down on yourself for missing the mark on the first try – that’s what you and countless other great writers throughout history have had to do to get to the right end results."
Leave a Reply.
Writing and editing can be pretty rigorous processes if you want to do them well, but that's what this page is here for. Check out the latest tips here.